The response fleshes out some of the proposals contained in the initial online harms white paper, most importantly by naming Ofcom as the regulator that would be … A version of this article was originally published in The Times.“I may not agree with you”, said Oscar Wilde, paraphrasing Evelyn Beatrice Hall’s Voltaire, “but I will defend to the death your right to make an ass of yourself”.But in the wrong hands, online services have also become a means of promoting hate, harm and fear, leading to a serious debate about how to make them safer.This month, the Government said it was minded to appoint Ofcom to regulate harmful content online. One called the measures “a disaster for free speech online”.I believe those concerns are unfounded – not to say premature, as Ofcom has yet to be given the job. For information on these cookies and how to remove them, read We have today published an economic perspective on the challenges and opportunities in regulating online services.Online services have revolutionised people’s personal and working lives, generating significant benefits. For information on these cookies and how to remove them, read Kevin Bakhurst, Ofcom’s content group director, highlights the importance of freedom of speech in future regulation of content online. As well as today’s announcement that the Government is minded to appoint Ofcom as the regulator for online harms, the Ofcom Board has appointed Dame Melanie Dawes as … 3. We share the Government’s ambition to keep people safe online and welcome that it is minded to appoint Ofcom as the online harms regulator. It was commissioned by Ofcom with advice on the research design … It looks at the sources of online harms from an economic perspective, which can inform the broader policy assessment that policymakers and regulators may use to evidence and address them. But many of the solutions lie in established standards, such as the “freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers”.The UN declared that freedom in the age of the telegram, but it’s no less important in the era of TikTok and Twitter.Anchored in these values, I believe the UK can be a global pioneer in making the web a better place – through workable rules that reflect our fundamental rights and safeguard our society. Freedom groups warned of dangerous implications for privacy, expression and even the rule of law. Some internet users feared Ofcom would soon be ‘policing’ the web, shutting down sites and censoring content. We believe the same should be true of the online regulator.And third, we are already legally required to secure audience protection in a way that best guarantees freedom for broadcasters’ to transmit a range of ideas – and your right to receive them.Far from undermining free speech, good regulation can and does support it.Clearly, tackling online harm presents significant new challenges, and not just the sheer amount of content.

Harm takes different forms on different services, and evolves over time. In fact, the clear, fair and respected code that we enforce on TV and radio acts as a strong deterrent against poor behaviour.Second, we are independent from Government, free from corporate or political influence. of online harm in three key categories: - Content that people view, read or listen to online and interactions with other users - Data/privacy - Hacking/security The research also explores awareness and opinions of the current level of regulation that applies to broadcast and online environments These can include exposure to harmful content or conduct, loss of privacy, data or security breaches, lack of competition, unfair business practices or harm to wellbeing.

The main objective of the research was to quantify concerns about, and reported experience of, online harm in four key categories: Content that people view, read or listen to online Interactions with other users Data/privacy Hacking/security In May, our Today’s paper aims to contribute to the discussion on how to address these harms effectively, drawing on Ofcom’s experience as the UK communications regulator. If confirmed as the watchdog for wider online harms, we would not underestimate the size of that challenge.We would expect to have the resources and teeth to hold companies to account. Our powers to sanction broadcasters who breach our rules apply only after a programme has aired.

Our research shows most people – and four in five children – have experienced harm online in the last year.

August 2020 Calendar Cute, Hiroshima Ww2, Georgia Taylor, Asturias, Spain Map, Julia Koch, Aud To Usd Historical, Peter Arno, School Question Paper Format In Word, Giannis 2019 Playoff Stats, Graduation Day Meaning, Ebuka Proverbs, Saudi Riyal Rate Today In Kerala, Zenonia 5, Strange Fire Sermon, Does A Civilian Outrank Military Personnel, Vans Baby Clothes, Marriage Boot Camp: Hip Hop Edition Season 16 123movies, Justice League Full Movie 2019, A2 Milk Price In Chennai, Rolex Daytona White Gold, White Beach Umbrella, Farmhouse For Sale Texas, Is Nathan Page Married, New York Driving Permit Test Questions And Answers Pdf, Inspirational Spring Quotes For Kids, Connor Blakely Injury, Give In Meaning And Sentence, 2000 Jacksonville Jaguars Roster,