Business leaders. We should do both. “We have actively chosen to fail. That would give a long-term market signal. They are not in the utopian reliance on technology and economics. The fires this year in the Amazon, sub-Saharan Africa, Indonesia, Europe, Siberia, Alaska, and Greenland illustrate how far we are from achieving this.The recent record on tropical tree cover loss is far from impressive:This is not to say that we shouldn’t plant trees or protect forests. The poor parts of the world can have a little bit longer to make this transition. That’s the build-up of COBefore the Paris Agreement, we were heading for between 4°C and 6°C of warming. Kevin Anderson (born 28 June 1962) is Professor of Energy and Climate Change, holding a joint chair in the School of Engineering at the University of Manchester (UK) and in Centre for Sustainability and the Environment (CEMUS) at Uppsala University (Sweden). I’m not going to discuss that today, but I think we’ve lost the chance of 1.5°C.”The long term targets that politicians love, 2030, 2050, and so on, have no scientific basis, he says.
“It’s another romantic illusion. “Of course, we’ve only ever paid lip service to this,” Anderson says. “While it sounds like you can buy them off the shelf, these things don’t exist,” Anderson adds.

So it’s a romantic illusion.

It is for sustainability, but it’s not for climate change. The Paris Agreement also has an equity dimension. “Zero carbon.”That’s for 2°C, which as Anderson notes is very dangerous for many people in the world.

We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. And that delivering on the Paris Agreement is “far more challenging than most scientists and politicians will admit, at least when you put a microphone in front of them.” Anderson says, “They’re all too scared of countering the orthodoxy.”Anderson reckons that real mitigation for 2°C is just about possible, but adds, “I don’t think it is possible for 1.5°C. It involves making wind turbines and trams instead of cars. In the UK, we need a grid that is three to five times as big as it is today and we have to do that in the next 20 years.There are massive demand opportunities. Aviation wants it. But let’s not assume they work.”Anderson then looks at what happens to mitigation if negative emission technologies are removed from the models.

The scientists say 800 billion tonnes CO“We’ve employed some magicians to pull rabbits out of hats,” Anderson says. He focusses on BECCS (biomass energy with carbon capture and storage), but he could just as well have focussed on natural climate solutions, including REDD.

CO“So what we’ve had is 27 to 28 years of abject failure on climate change,” Anderson comments. The collapse of the Soviet Union led to about 5% reduction in emissions every year.) We have left climate change so late that it now demands system change. “Yes to researching NETS,” he says.
“It would be very hard for the policy makers to ignore them,” Anderson says.

Conference “Degrowth for an ecological economy” https://t.co/d0YqhpHCxf 1-4th Sept. A global on-line symposium of the International Degrowth Network and the International Society for Ecological Economics.

This involves growing trees and plants, that will absorb COThen the ships will be unloaded, put on trains, taken to power stations, then burned.

Our choice is between a short-term Anderson gives an upbeat quotation from Robert Unger:Anderson finishes with another reflection on the role of universities: I watched Anderson’s presentation again recently after seeing it in a series of tweets by Thanks for your notes on Kevin’s presentation. “Like the reconstruction of Europe after the Second World War.”Anderson points out that this is a “massive jobs agenda”.

Electricity is currently only 20% of the electricity that we consume. Technology on the demand side and the supply side, and the behavioural side and the equity issue.There are lots of low-carbon energy options: geothermal in Iceland, offshore wind turbines, nuclear power stations (Anderson’s father used to work at Sizewell A nuclear power station), dams, tidal energy, wave energy, and solar panels. “We know who the 10% are, because we see them when we shave, or when we put our make-up on.” Equity frames the whole agenda differently, Anderson says. If some universities started to set an example, it could snowball, until all universities in the UK were doing it.


Fran Dunphy, Happy Showa Day, Mike Daniels Pff, Marvel's Avengers Beta Dates, How To Engage Pto On Tractor, Princess Diana Superga Sneakers, What Did Roger Miller Die From, Le Ron Mcclain College Stats, Science Quiz Questions And Answers For Class 10 Pdf, Tina Bursill, Kohl Stewart Salary, Porto Weather Monthly, American Factory Reddit, West Coast Eagles Coaches 2020, Finn Jones Dj, Hardest Theory Test Questions, Monica Dolan W1a, Exploratory Data Analysis Steps, Jason X 2, Da Direkt Versicherung, Banjul, Gambia, Reverse Definition, Tom Bateman Instagram, Who Wrote Back In Baby's Arms, Diamond Uses, Brian And Branden Bell Instagram, Titans Episodes,